Really cool, @hsjobeki!
Context: https://hoogle.haskell.org
Really cool, @hsjobeki!
Context: https://hoogle.haskell.org
It would be nice to also include the builtins.
Just pushed a new commit including all the builtins. ![]()
Very nice. Will the trivial builders eg symlinkJoin be in scope for this project?
Ok, but what’s Hoogle?
Ok, I can guess by reverse inference from what this site shows, but really, why assume?
Hoogle is this site but for Haskell ![]()
Damn functional programmers with their recursion…
@uep thanks – you caught a blind spot there. Updated the top post.
explicit > implicit ![]()
Looks like some of the trivial builders could be added with a little work.
I thought it might make sense to extend the scope even further, because i‘d like to also explore e.g ‚stdenv.mkDerivation‘ with all the attributes explained. I will need some time to figure things out, then it might make sense to add all nixpkgs functions; one context after another until we can search really everything.
For drv-parts I already ported the interface of mkDerivation to the module system. The types are already there, just the descriptions are missing (as of now).
The modules in drv-parts could be used as a data source for noogle.
To add information about other package functions like buildPythonPackage, for example, one could just port those to drv-parts as well.
This would benefit drv-parts and noogle at the same time.
Hooray! I’ve looked for something like this a few times and just navigated to the forum to ask about it. Glad I searched once more! Thanks @hsjobeki (and @fricklerhandwerk for posting about it).
trivial-builder have been added today. Also they don’t document their typed-signatures, the examples and descriptions are indexable.
→ If you’re missing some functions from trivial-builders it may not be documented or missing the documentation strings. (in pkgs/trivial-builders.nix)
Thanks @phaer for adding openSearch to noogle.
Noogle can now be used as search-engine directly from within the browsers search field.
I just discovered this, and it’s really great - thanks! Can’t wait for more static typing ![]()